Welcome to the VFW Pacific Post 10033, Pacific
| | |
 Thomas Tradewell |
Recent News Entries NY Man Attempting 4,500 Mile "Patriot Walk" for Veterans VFW Cites Backlog, Health Care as Top Legislative Priorities "Making Virutual Friends" VFW Blogger Interviews of D.Peirce & IJK VFW Washington Conference Live Stream Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Donates $100,000 to VFW Foundation’s Voice of Democracy Student Essay Contest |
|
Our Sponsors |
|
There is Equal Opportunity for the Appearance of Political, Product or Service Advertising on this Network. Advertising is for Informational Purposes Only and Should Not Be Construed as an Endorsement.
|
|
Become a Friend of the Department of Pacific
Multimedia
| | |
Veterans Resources
Veterans Coalition
VA Simplifies Rules for PTSD Pay
Posted at 08:56 AM on Tuesday, August 25, 2009 by post10033
WASHINGTON (Aug. 24, 2009) - Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki announced the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is taking steps to assist Veterans seeking compensation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)."The hidden wounds of war are being addressed vigorously and comprehensively by this administration as we move VA forward in its transformation to the 21st century," said Secretary Shinseki.
The VA is publishing a proposed regulation today in the Federal Register to make it easier for a Veteran to claim service connection for PTSD by reducing the evidence needed if the stressor claimed by a Veteran is related to fear of hostile military or terrorist activity. Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted over the next 60 days. A final regulation will be published after consideration of all comments received.
Under the new rule, VA would not require corroboration of a stressor related to fear of hostile military or terrorist activity if a VA psychiatrist or psychologist confirms that the stressful experience recalled by a Veteran adequately supports a diagnosis of PTSD and the Veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor.
Previously, claims adjudicators were required to corroborate that a non-combat Veteran actually experienced a stressor related to hostile military activity. This rule would simplify the development that is required for these cases.
Read more
Previous Page | Home | Next Page
